People's Health Movement PHM - re-establish health and equitable development as top priorities with comprehensive primary health care


home page contact us     

About PHM News Room Events PHM Worldwide Campaigns Publications

Charters Voices PHA 2000 Links Get Involved Spanish
 Food Security

Last Update:  March 14, 2005 

 
 
Quick Feedback
Has this information been
useful? Yes    No
Name
Email
Keep me informed
Thank you

 
   Issue Papers
Africa Immunization
Environmental Links
Critical Issues
Exporting Curruption
Kerala Campaign
Healthcare Sevices
Mental Health
Time Bank Network
R & D
Principle Actors
Food Security
Holistic Health
Health-Development
Healthcare Reforms
Impact on Health
Unequal Relations
Globalization-Health
Globalization
Decentralization
Pre PHA 2000

 

Public Health Dimension of Food Security - Issue Papers

Public Health Dimension of Food Security - Issues

Public Health Dimension of Food Security
 
 

Mathura P. Shrestha and Indira Shrestha
- People's Health Assembly - Issue Paper
 
This document inThis document in pdf formatpdf format 

 
1. Food Security: What it is or should be

Food is an important part of life and living - ensuring and sustaining life and development, and enriching the living. Food is also a part of enjoyment. We have with us myriad of food cultures and traditions. Food is an essential component for human growth and development. Roles of nutrients and micronutrients are well known. For normal human development the assured and regular intake of balanced food in adequate quantity and quality is essential. While undernutrition and malnutrition are the result mainly of inadequate and low quality food intake, over-intake of food or over-consumption of some components of food or nutrients may also cause severe problems of malnutrition with log-term and lasting consequences of ill-health. Harmful contaminants may cause sever malnutrition due to liver damage and interference in digestion and absorption.
 
However, food can no longer be taken for granted. I would like to present some scenario related to food security.

  1. We all have heard and experienced poverty, hunger and famine. These were and are essentially preventable. Yet they are so much in and around the people of countries like ours. These are issues of inequality, exploitation, and neglected management and distribution of wealth and opportunities.

  2. In addition to the scores of food related health hazards related to cultivation, storage, processing, distribution and consumption food is getting `dosed up’ with pesticides, harmful chemicals, hormones, bio-toxins, carcinogens and mutagenes. We are already exposed to `Genetically Modified Food’ (GMF). The long term consequences of this could only be known and tackled after many generations of human race. Still worse, the profit hunting multi-national companies are in process of active and aggressive marketing of the seeds with `Terminal Genes’ (TG). These seeds probably would produce more food but the sterile crop becomes useless for further propagation. Thus the exploiters have with them the sure way to make the farmers and food growers to lose their independence and choices, and enforce dependency.

  3. Use of food for non-food industry is another headache for those who desire food security. The policy makers are loudly yet randomly, promoting ‘cash crops’ without necessary research, information and evaluation. In addition, food continues to be diverted to produce low-quality and junk foods, alcoholic beverages and bottled drinks or even pseudo-foods or imitation-food. More tobacco leaves are cultivated to produce `poison-sticks’ and chewable than the needed green-leafy-vegetables (GLF) in most parts of Nepal where prevalence of malnutrition is severe.

  4. Environmental impact and ecological stresses related to intensive food cultivation and processing are getting serious. Intensive farming tend to make our air too heavy, the soil too poisonous and water rather unfit for drinking and cleaning.

  5. On the top of all these, food is now becoming an unwelcome tool of international power- politics. With globalization around us, the food monopoly will add another dimension to the colonization of body and mind - the colonization of living itself. Food-power is going to pose more threats than guns and bombs.

In the face of all these challenges and problems, we have got be sensitive. Since these are our own problems, we have got to find our solutions. At least one can dream to have proper sociopolitical environment for food security with following criteria or secured food that is:

  • accessible to all,

  • adequate quantitatively and qualitatively according to the physiological needs of individual population with reasonable but assured surplus at any one point of time,

  • appropriate and safe,

  • affordable by all, and

  • acceptable to all.

In addition, the food security system should:

  • provide access to adequate and appropriate information and knowledge to all leading to the community’s healthy food behavior,

  • ongoing and in-built research and surveillance for appropriate food policy decisions and actions, and

  • develop and enforce regulatory systems to prevent and to protect the people and consumers from harms related to mystified advertisement or disinformation or misinformation, illicit trades and harmful commercial practices, toxic additives, and harmful food practices or unsanitary conditions of production, storage, distribution and consumption, and 

 

2. Food politics

Unfortunately, even today at the advent of twenty-first century, food is used as a tool of power politics. So called food and trade embargo are unethical, irresponsible and principle causes of human induced catastrophe, deprivation and famine. Internationally and nationally, food is often victim of trade and price wars. Exploitation on food has been historical event, yet it is continuing now in more sophisticated way producing more severe trauma to the people. Because of food politics, farmers are not able to produce what the people need or want, cash determines food distribution, and substantial quantity of food and agricultural products are diverted to non-food industries. Because of food politics even the primary producers do not get just return. Their choice and freedom grossly limited. They are forced to be mere tools in the system out of food politics.
 

3. Demystifying effects of impact of malnutrition on intellectual growth

Many different misconceptions related to food consumption or uses are common. Some continued to pray human belief system in so called scientific or psuedo-scientific umbrella. One such example, - many believe that malnourished or undernourished person becomes intellectually inferior. The theory is not true or really scientific. The body system protect the core central nervous system related to intelligence so well by diverting the nutrients from other organ systems that physical survival is not possible if that is grossly affected. Even the intellectual conditions related to hypothyroidism and hypoparathyroidism is temporary and reversible. Amnesia and defects in memory and perception associated with malnutrition resulting from chronic alcoholism and toxic pathology are secondary to functional damage of other organs or systems and aging. Many research conducted in Malaysia, Singapore, Hong Kong and US has shown that intelligence is related to social and intellectual opportunity and stimuli, and not related to class, ethnicity, race and social or economic affluence. Food needs taboos and mysticism need to be demystified. Information on food should be rational and evidence-based.
 

4. Public health problems related to food.

Endogenous food toxins:
Certain food contains endogenous food toxins, anti-metabolites, allergens, carcinogens and other harmful alkaloids and substances. The unprocessed fresh tapioca, wild yams like ‘Simal-tarul’(roots of bombax trees), gittha, Bhyakur, raw cashew nuts, and certain species of taros contain rather high concentration of hydrocyanic acid (HCN) - a very poisonous substance. Gittha and Bhyakur also contain certain estrogen-like substances that may retard human growth and fertility. The effects of poisonous mushrooms are well recognized. The poisons like solanin, nicotine and several carcinogens in tobacco leaf and stem is well established and known. Even unprocessed soybean contains urase and several anti-metabolic substances which are however heat-labile or neutralized by fermentation. The traditional ways of cooking and preparation detoxify or neutralize the most of but not all endogenous-toxins or anti-metabolites in gittha, bhyakur etc. All these necessitate the adequate provision of information related to food and food practices. Further research on effective elimination of endogenous food toxins is necessary.
 
 
Inappropriate food processing and handling:
It is well known that many important nutrients are denaturalized, altered or even destroyed by faulty processing of food. Food gets contaminated during processing, handling, distribution and consumption. Many undesirable or even harmful substances enter the food as additives and toxic metabolites during food processing and preservation. Appropriate education is to be developed for good kitchen practices, good food manufacturing and trade practices, and good eating habits.
 
 
Food contamination
Food gets contaminated during all steps in food chain staring from cultivation to consumption. Food contamination is preventable. However, an integrated and coordinated policy and programs are necessary with adequate surveillance system for food safety. The contaminants may be:

  • Micro-bacterial - viral (enteroviruses like HvA, NANB, rota and adeno viruses causing diarrhea, polioviruses), bacterial (like salmonella, shigella, food-poisoning bacteria, vibrio cholera, bacterial toxins), parasitological (like nematodes, plathyhelminths, protozoals - mainly amoebiasis, giardiasis, cryptosporidium, trychomonas -), and fungal (mycotoxins including aflatoxin),

  • Harmful metabolites and biological contaminants like methyl alcohol, estrogen-like substances, hormones, biotoxins including mycotoxins especially aflatoxins, allergens and carcinogens.

  • Chemical contaminants - like pesticide residues, nitrates, nitrites, high-salinity, fluorides, arsenic compounds, lead and other heavy metals. These have serious and long-term health hazards.

  • Food additives - like inedible coloring, flavoring, taste-enhancer or modifiers, preservatives and softners.

  • Unhealthy adulteration. - The adulteration law in Nepal needs modification. Informed addition of beneficial or non-harmful natural substances should not be categorized as adulterated. For example, practice of mixing wheat flower with corn and millet flower has benefit of multi-mix cereal.

  • Irradiated food - for prolonged preservation is never tested for safety but yet practiced.
     

5. New food sources

This is interesting area and a lot of money is spent in this. The major aspects in the area includes:

Utilization of food sources which were previously wasted or not used.
This is mainly to enrich fodder thus ensuring better recovery for human consumption indirectly. According to one estimate in 1963, global losses were as high as 32-75% for grains, 53% for potatoes, 34-44% for eggs, fish and meat, and 35% for fruits. A lot of investment is made to minimize the loss since then. In addition, untapped resources of ‘quality food’ from wasted skimmed milk, blood, and low-grade meat and fish products are being generated. In addition, maximization of food recovery with better processing and storage technique or extensive use of antioxidants, preservatives and other substances (eg. tocopherol and glutamic acid) are made. The production of food by converting plant food sources into animal product is now very efficient. Traditional loss of food from the fodder used to be very high with total loss in protein being as high as 90%, fats about 80%, carbohydrate 60%. With the use of enzymes and harmless bacteria these inert food in fodder can now be hydrolized industrially for better recovery by the animals. Use of carbamides, non-protein nitrogen including ammonia and urea (used for artificial manure), synthetic and plant-based hormones, fattening agents, antibiotics and other artificial substitutes are also used extensively and in ever increasing proportion to natural fodder. The practice would impose serious impact on human health through human food chain. The safety of these is to be evaluated and rigorously monitored and regulated.
 
However, survey or research on traditional and ethnic recipes or culinary practices nationally and globally would generate many potential food sources that are safe, tasty and wholesome. Lost traditional menus also may be rediscovered.
 
 
Microbiological production of food:
Microbes (single cells) are efficient converters of proteins directly from raw materials. Conversion rate to a standard protein according to a chemical score in the following table provides relative advantage of single cell:
 
 
TABLE 1: RELATIVE RATE OF PROTEIN ACCUMULATION
 

  

Cows

1

Pig

10

Chicken

25

Cereals/Beans

30

Single Cells

18000

 
 

(Source: Skryabin GK, Belikov VM. New food sources. (in) Rajki S, Bruce A (ed). Round table conference on food production, nutrition and health. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó; 1983: 17-25.)
 
 

However, despite these advantages, the single cell (or microbiological) production of food protein and consumption has physiological, psychological, hygienic and technical risks and problems. Yeast (single cell) constitutes a substantial proportion of diet of a person consuming bread (about 0.001%). Higher consumption than that has a health risk because of high content of nucleic acids. Substantial use of yeast or other single cells or their protein extracts would expose the person to high content of nucleic acids, and possible presence of toxic proteins and peptides. Consumers would not be able to evaluate the risks without a sophisticated laboratory backups or experts. Thus this will curtail the autonomy of the consumers.
 
 
Artificial Foods
Examples of artificial food developed are artificial rice and other cereals, noodles, pastas, potato, meat and meat extenders, caviar, beverages and confectionery. International norm to produce artificial food is actually to be based on non-synthetic processing using high quality natural products or wastage. The product is to be so balanced or enriched that biological and nutritional values including essential amino acids, technological properties (look, texture, taste and roughage contents), and wholesomeness in relation to health outcomes and psychosocial satisfaction after consumption should be better or, at least, not worse than natural products. For example, the production of artificial rice is aimed at reincorporating the peripheral layers of natural rice (kernel, external tegument and barn), containing high biological values, that get lost during milling and polishing, and enriching with essential amino acids and other micronutrients. The method of producing artificial rice is supposed to be based on rice flour from crushed rice, containing rice grits and barn, with addition of milk proteins. The artificial food is at present widely used in breakfast and precooked food packets.
 
However, in developing countries like Nepal where food inspection and regulatory systems are lacking production and consumption of artificial food may have serious impact in health and development beside the higher cost. Recently, even in US the episode of high dioxin content in animal feed and human food chain, resulting from the use of artificial food and additives, should bear a strong lesson to all of us here and the policy makers. In addition, the socioeconomic impact on the nation’s agrobased development programs, health and environment should be thoroughly studied before licensing. The cost of such product is highly inflated, partly to meet the cost of aggressive marketing practices.
 
It must be however mentioned here that most of the commercially available bottled-, tinned- or packaged-foods are far inferior compared to balanced natural products as far as wholesomeness, health benefit, price and environment cost are concerned.
 

 

6. Genetically Modified Foods (GMF)

There has been incredible progress in new biotechnology with commercialized products of insulin, human growth hormones, interferon, and recombinant vaccines using human cell culture or ‘novel’ bacteria. Now there is with us a rough draft map of entire human gene. Prospects of developing ‘novel bacteria’ producing like diary animals (rather manufacturing like a factory) the desired nutrients, foods, pharmaceutical products including vaccines and therapeutic recombinant DNA [rDNA] and cells or organs for graft appear to be high in agenda of so called scientific community. But the concern for safety of humans and environment was so high that in US during early 1970’s a moratorium was declared on all rDNA research until very stringent guidelines were developed by rDNA Advisory Committee (RCA). But the research continued using attenuated or non-pathogenic organisms in spite of the moratorium. Similarly, the prospects of commercialization of GMFs are high in agenda of commercial giants. Countries in West are reviewing the moratorium or modifying the restricting guidelines. At present it is very difficult to project the future scenario resulting from widespread use of GMF. We would like to project some hypothetical scenario:
 
Suppose, because of leak in laboratory or faulty evaluation what will happen if following conditions or calamities are surfaced?

  • If human immune system is so altered that body systems or immunity failed in recognizing the antigen or pathogens which, so far, were normally resisted by human’s natural immunity or acquired immunity with conventional vaccines?

  • If human body system is so modified that it becomes resistant to most of the presently available antibiotics, chemotherapy and important life-saving drugs? Are we to keep on depending on new generations of drugs produced by multinational companies?

  • If the vaccines or biologically active substances or life saving drug itself undergoes changes in body due to GMF and that would not produce desired or expected results?

  • If the long term risk or cost to human health and environment would be high or even catastrophic?

  • If mutagenecity of GMF would produce the person described in Aldus Hauxley’s ‘Brave New World’ - efficient and desired human giants with programmed (or authorized) intelligence?
     

7. Food industry and hygiene

Food industries are growing rapidly. In addition to the need for development of appropriate policy related to health, agriculture, trade, manufacture and licensing, and consumer protection rational regulatory systems are to be developed and enforced. Any food industry must be subjected to constant and ongoing supervision by food and sanitary experts with appropriate laboratory backups to monitor safety. Participatory approach to develop policy and evaluation systems with involvement of representatives from consumer forums, human rights groups, health and municipality (or local-self-government) authorities, food and nutrition experts, industrialists and researchers or academicians is necessary. This concept goes well with the current management culture and concept of participatory democracy.
 

8. Role of Junk Food, bottled/tinned foods, Infant Food formula

Junk and fast food industries belong to high-risk category. High-pressure steaming, high-temperature-baking and frying are extensively used in addition to other processes like thawing, blanching, rendering, proofing and sterilizing. Any flaw in any of these processes may generate risks. In addition to the problems related health and hygiene, clusters of risks are common in fast food preparation. These are related to the use of low-grade food, destruction of or degradation in nutrients or food quality due to high heat during fast-cooking, altered palatability due to non-enzymatic browning (Maillard) reaction or other process to have off-flavors and off-colors, and production of potentially toxic and mutagenic compounds. In addition, these foods are too fatty with low roughage. Maillard reaction is deliberately sought by the manufacturers to improve taste and look. But the reaction produce inert and water-insoluble polymers of carbohydrates and proteins substantially reducing bioavailability of the food. There is disproportionate nutrient density especially of fats, protein and sugar. Obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and brain, heart and kidney problems tend to be common among those addicted to junk foods and bottled/tinned foodstuffs.

WHO and many international agencies actively discourage Infant-Food-Formula (IFF). During early 80’s all the governments of the world except US came together in UN to give YES vote to ban infant food formula. But one NO vote backed by TNCs became more powerful. Mere availability coupled with aggressive promotion of IFF tends to change the present trend away from breast-feeding of infants with serious health consequences. Improper dilution or admixture coupled with difficult cleaning or poor hygienic conditions common in bottle feeding result in too many infant deaths and diseases. Infant food formula or so-called baby foods are inferior even as weaning food compared to traditional weaning food fortified with diary milk and gheeu or butter or vegetable oil. Commercial baby foods may produce plump and flabby babies but not healthy or strong babies.
  

9. Environmental impact of intensive agriculture

Though stressed by many countries as their development policy the environmental cost of intensive farming is too high. It tends to pollute seriously water and soil directly and air indirectly. It depreciates the agriculture socially and ecologically. What is needed is agricultural self sufficiency based upon eco-friendly, intensive and self-sustaining small farming technology practiced in Kathmandu fifty years ago or traditional Chinese ‘gardening’ technique. The Japoos in Nepal and the Chinese grew 10-12 vegetable and grain crops a year, since time immemorial. In Nepal that culture is now dying.
  

10. Environmental impact of food waste

Food waste going directly to environment or sewage has a serious impact in health and ecosystem. In cities where municipality operated composting and anaerobic biodegradation facility, for the production of compost and bio-energy, is absent this aggravates the pollution of rivers, ground water and soil. Wastage from food industries if not treated and managed properly by the industrialists prior to release in environment, particularly the sewage systems or river would erode health and environment. Such practice should be dealt as criminal offense.
  

11. Food Intolerance/Allergy

Some people are allergic to some food. Diarrhea and vomiting in a few babies may be due to milk allergy (related to lactose or milk-protein) although the prevalence of milk intolerance is far less in developing countries compared to developed ones. A reliable system of diagnosis and management of infant’s milk intolerance exists in all countries. Allergy to natural food is less common and less serious compared to additives in food and untraditional or inedible varieties.
  

12. Conclusion

Food security needs be expressed in holistic context. The world produces food far above the needs of the global requirement. It is not only the question of quantity of food production. When we carefully analyze the history of famine - from potato famine of Ireland to present famine in Somalia - the cause becomes mainly human made one rather than crop failure. Proper and judicious food management including universal access and distribution system becomes more important. Diversity in food culture with opportunity to have healthy and balanced multi-mix diet with a lot of fresh green vegetables and fruits must be encouraged. People’s individual right to self-determination, health, education, clean environment is related to issues of food safety. Any prescribed culture or myth related to food for the benefit of some (corporate) is violation of human rights and must be resisted.
 
 
Kathmandu, October 6, 2000

 


 
Biodata summary

Mathura P. Shrestha
Chairperson Resource Center for Primary Health Care, PO Box 117, Bagbazar, Kathmandu, Nepal. Email: mathura@healthnet.org.np

Indira Shrestha
Pediatrician and Honorary Member Secretary and Coordinator, ENHR Nepal Network, PO Box 117, Bagbazar, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Quick Feedback: Has this information been useful?

 

 
 Back Home Up Next [include/copyright.htm]